1. Editorial mission
MERHI ONE answers durable, practical health questions with clear language and proportionate certainty. Topic selection may consider public relevance, search demand, clinical consequences, misinformation risk, reader questions, and gaps in the library—not sponsor preference.
2. Workflow
- Define the question, population, intervention or marker, comparison, outcomes, market, and update trigger.
- Search prioritized sources; map claims to supporting references; draft with explicit uncertainty and practical boundaries.
- Complete medical/editorial review, link check, localization for Brazil and the United States, and final publication review.
- Display publication date, last scientific review, author or editor, references, limitations, and evidence rating when appropriate.
3. Independence and conflicts
Editorial conclusions cannot be purchased. Sponsorship, affiliate relationships, free products, financial interests, and material conflicts must be disclosed near affected content. Advertising must be visually and verbally distinguishable from editorial material.
4. Corrections and updates
Material errors are corrected promptly and significant changes should be documented. Typographic corrections may be made without a formal note. Pages are reviewed when major guidance, safety signals, regulation, or outcome evidence changes; a date alone does not imply that every statement was newly researched that day.
5. Authors, reviewers, and AI-assisted work
Named humans remain accountable for published content. Software or AI may assist organization, translation, consistency checks, or drafting, but it is not treated as a scientific source, author, or final reviewer. References must be opened, verified, and tied to the claim they support.
6. Reader feedback
Readers may report an error, broken source, undisclosed conflict, accessibility problem, or localization concern through Contact. Personal medical cases should not be submitted.
Official sources